The pricing just doesn't make much sense now. And if that leaked roadmap for Intel's 10th-gen processors is to be believed, and they enable hyperthreading across their lineup to match AMD on thread count for their next CPUs, the 9600K may only be i3-level performance by around the end of the year, and the new i5s may perform more like the current i7s. But while a 6-core, 6-thread 9600K might currently run the vast majority of games and applications rather well, it's probably not going to hold up as well over time. LordVile said:Also why would ANYONE buy the 9600k?Some may be primarily interested in lightly-threaded performance for the specific software they run. Intel chips are too expensive for what they are, they offer no HT against AMD chip that do, AMD has caught up on IPC even though speed is still capped about 0.5Ghz slower, they are more energy efficent and have implemented new tech like PCIE 4 that Z390 boards don't have.ĭoesn't matter how "good" the board is if the platforms position is untenable to everyone who doesn't need quick rendering times on adobe premiere. The 9700k is 365 for 8 cores where the 3700x has 8 with SMT for 320 but includes a cooler. The 3600 6c/12t for 200 vs the 6 core 6 threaded 9600K at 220 again without a cooler. For most tasks the much cheaper R5 2600 and a B450 board would do fine and for not much more you can get an X570 board and a ryzen 3000 series chip which for a start the 3700x is over £100 cheaper than the 9900K, the R9 3900X which demolishes the 9900K in productivity is the same price once you factor in the cooler you have to buy for the 9900K and all down the stack AMD is the cheaper and better option. AMD is brought up because very few people should actually buy intel chips at the current time. It's not great, you could get a lot more for not much more investment. And I don't know why anyone would bring AMD processors into a Z390 motherboard discussion.Z370 boards are also cheaper and not advised for the higher end chips like the 9900K.īecause the only thing you can put into a Z390 board is a 8th or 9th gen intel CPU. Literally the only reason to buy an intel platform now is the Adobe suite to use the iGPU for rendering and 240Hz gaming because in everything else AMD has either caught or exceeded intel at a lower price.Ĭrashman said:What's still available for Z370? The Z390 is basically Z370 with integrated USB3 Gen2. Or you could get a 3600 with for less than the 9600K with a board for the same price for the set and have features like PCIE 4. You can get a 6c/12t R5 for just over half the price with a b450 board that goes for under 100. It was supposed to have been a June review but X570 coverage started before I got around to writing this review's conclusion.Or you could just get a Z370 board? Also why would ANYONE buy the 9600k? It's a 6c Chip with no HT. We procured this in May as an alternative to the Gaming SLI, which was cut from US distribution shortly after being awarded. Not a year old in review options, it wasn't available to us until November. And what else would you use with any current, unlocked Intel 1151 processor? ![]() Testing with the heavy power load of the 9900K is just overkill enough to assure you that you can do anything you wish with the 9600k. Not that an average user would, but testing in that manner proved that the Z390 Gaming X really needs a fan to be very close to its CPU socket just to keep the voltage regulator from throttling back the CPU under heavy loads.Ĭrashman said:9600K. The Z390 Gaming X ran hotter, so hot that we wouldn’t recommend anyone run Prime95 small FFTs on a bone-stock Core i9-9900K using nothing more than the fans of a front-mounted radiator to cool its voltage regulator. It’s not just that Gigabyte subbed a pair of USB 2.0 ports where the more-expensive board had USB3, and it’s not just that the firm left out the group of PCIe switches that made x8/x8 mode possible on the pricier version either. Final ThoughtsĮven though it appears similar to the Z390 Gaming SLI, the Z390 Gaming X also appears to have far lower manufacturing cost. The Z390 Gaming X takes second place, followed by the Z390 Gaming SLI. ASRock’s tiny lead in DRAM overclocking helps it hit the highest bandwidth with four ranks installed, despite the frequency advantage available after dropping to two modules. Four ranks outperform two on Intel’s platforms, so that four single-rank DIMMs also outperform too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |